Revenge of the Nerds

I’m a nerd.*  I program computers, like Star Wars, the whole bit.  I spend a lot of time thinking about how to do things smarter, rather than harder.

These days, it’s a pretty good gig to be a nerd.  While most of the U.S. is still struggling with unemployment, Silicon Valley is booming.  And the nerds have been good to us: the Internet is the best encyclopedia/newspaper ever, and caters to the narrowest of interests (I mean, you’re reading this, aren’t you?).

More important but less obvious is the tremendous amount of work you don’t have to do.  Industrialized agriculture means I don’t have to till the ground.  Electric power means I don’t have to chop wood to have light at night (as I write this, at 10 PM).

People like me are busily engaged in automating as many things as we can.  The list of things that require human labor is losing items.

Classical economic theory would hold that that’s totally fine, because instead of chopping wood or whatever, we can spend that time studying the finer points of designing iPhones.  In other words, the list of things that require human labor can gain items too.

And that’s generally true.   But it neglects one important thing: it retards development.  While designing iPhones may be alpha, learning to design them is not.  Learning is inherently a beta experience.  One learns from one’s betters, not one’s inferiors.

“Smart” may be attractive, but “dutiful student” is not.

When you hear “educated, specialized economy,” think “more time spent in school in a beta frame.”  Worse, the frame may be internalized, and remain after school.

Alpha is a societal resource, and the long years of preparation for specialized labor are one of the causes of the shortage of it.

Thanks, nerds.

* Nerd:  a guy who reacts to being a small fish in a big pond by retreating to a smaller pond.


  1. anon says:

    Ha, that’s an excellent definition of nerd. I consider myself an ex-nerd (though I wonder how much that’s true if I spend late nights reading obscure blogs like this), and I completed my transition into a “regular guy” by going to trade school instead of going to college to become a doctor like I was supposed to. I’ve found myself a lot happier and a lot more able to relate to people than my nerdy high school friends who went on to study linguistics and engineering. I’m a lot better with girls than they are too.

    Having said that, there’s trade offs to all of this. They’ll be making a lot more money than me in 10 years, unless my band unexpectedly takes off. In that time my youthful good looks won’t really count for much.

  2. Exfernal says:

    Self-studying a subject you are interested in does not add to your “beta frame”. With conflicting sources available you have to make value judgements about their quality. It’s a useful skill to have. Makes being duped a little harder, for one thing.

  3. disenchantedscholar says:

    Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
    I think it’s about depending on another for your curriculum instead of constructing it yourself. Following orders, like reading, writing for the approval of others, the exams for a grade like an obedient dog competition and finally the credential for something you might’ve self-taught allows the teachers to retain power over you until you surpass them (rare).

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s